Not so. If, just say for example, the NVDA Remote add-on was made legacy because it wouldn't be updated. Or even Joseph Screen Curtain add-on which has been made legacy. If we change it to say "the la

Seconded, although I'm not sure of the value of waiting even that long. Luke

That is nice forward-looking language choice, but us switching to that would be at least a year away, if not more likely 18 months. By then, we will very probably have a different solution either in p

This says "The following add-ons are no longer actively developed or incompatible with recent NvDA releases.". Recent is relative to the person reading it. Can this be changed to say something like: "

Personally my objection to that, is what users think of the development section. Add-ons there are considered a work in progress, not ready for use except by the adventurous. That is not true for add-

Nobody is talking about a legacy mode. It can't, and it won't. We're talking about the website. The add-ons website: whether to leave add-ons that are stable now, but become non-functional under 2019.

The last time we had this conversation (August?) I remember that I and others thought we should have a legacy stable section for such add-ons. I still think so. Luke

As I understand what you are saying, you would alter the existing addons names table, and add a nickname column. Thus making your look-up process easier. That seems perfectly reasonable if it is consi

Sorry, I thought I had clarified that section. The two files you need are: msgfmt.exe xgettext.exe In order to stop carrying these files in repos, or having to exempt them, and since I discontinued my

I have two points. 1. If any part of that was referencing the work that Derek and I are doing, I will note that by its nature, the PostGreSQL database used will include guaranteed unique numeric IDs f

You are making two assumptions there which may not be safe: First, that users will do the right thing in renaming the file or folder. Second, that NVDA will retain the appModule name equals applicatio

Joseph. With respect, I'm not sure that less than ten messages, and less than 24 hours of conversation, can really count as completed community feedback. I feel like this is a hasty reaction, and we d

I wrote that section with the thought of very new developers in mind, trying to cut down on information overload and eliminate confusion. Which is the very definition of an add-on as well, is it not?

In such a situation, updating the add-ons should be fine. Just be sure to answer "no" to the "restart NVDA" prompt. Luke

#addonrelease

Regarding your add-ons: I don't know anything about BGT games, but it seems possible people might want or be using that add-on if it is operational. I don't know what you modified in the Winamp one, b

Can someone comment further on this, as it's the first I've heard of capitalization being any kind of problem. Luke

Thanks. I saw that Reef had a pywin32-bin repo started back in May, but it's just a stub at this point, and I'm not sure if he's going to continue whatever that was. Luke

I thought I would take a stab at updating this. Unfortunately, almost immediately I ran into a major roadblock. It looks like some version of win32clipboard would need to be bundled with this add-on i

Agreed. It is unreasonable to expect authors to know the keystrokes for all other add-ons, but if somebody knows of a pre-existing conflict, pointing it out to the new add-on's author is possibly very

Yes, that is a known bug. It has been reported to that add-on's developer, and there is a long-standing issue in Focus Highlight's repo for it. I think this add-on is probably going to be irrelevant t